Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jesper De Jong vs Roberto Quiroz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jong vs Quiroz analysis and find out who is favored!
Jesper De Jong vs Roberto Quiroz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jong 2 - 1 Quiroz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jong has won 49.91% of points on their second serve, while Quiroz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jong, in recent form, has won 50.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quiroz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.68% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jong has saved 61.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quiroz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jong has won 59.65% of matches played (W/L 34/ 23), with Quiroz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Quiroz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 134/ 103), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 30/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13), where as Quiroz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Jong winning 2 times and Quiroz being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Jong winning 4 and Quiroz winning 3. The last match between Jong and Quiroz was at the Pereira Challenger, 30-03-2022, First, Clay with Roberto Quiroz getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:5:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jong and Quiroz have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jong winning 1 times and Quiroz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 5 tiebreaks against each other with Jong winning 4, and Quiroz 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jong has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.49 while Quiroz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jong has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quiroz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jong has converted 47.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quiroz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
176
Rank
135
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
759
Rank
172
High
32
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
63% (225-135)
Career Total W/L
54% (302-255)
60% (21-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$430,415
Career Prize Money
$98,220
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Roberto Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 39 | 43 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:5:18 | 2:5:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (163/247) | 60% (165/273) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (122/163) | 72% (118/165) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (44/84) | 61% (66/108) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 19% (3/16) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (89/273) | 33% (81/247) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats 
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Jesper De Jong
40%
(
29 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5) |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Roberto Quiroz
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
71%
(
83 of
117)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
83)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
117)
109
Total Points Won
116
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-6(6) |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Roberto Quiroz
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
19 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jesper De Jong | Roberto Quiroz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (21/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (431/384) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 179 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 99 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 316.11 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1549/2639) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1094/1549) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (544/1090) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (112/235) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1014/2544) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Quiroz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Roberto Quiroz
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Roberto Quiroz
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Roberto Quiroz
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Quiroz
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
38
Total Points Won
43
|
1-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Roberto Quiroz
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jong Vs Quiroz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
